It’s normal for JavaScript-based webpages to appear empty in Google’s cached view, says Google’s Search Advocate John Mueller.

It is just a normal JavaScript function. This is a small difference, but it is a difference in favor of the simplicity of functional components.

While this might not sound particularly fast, normal JavaScript (such as when you load the ExtremeTech website) is maybe 20 or 30 times slower than native code.

Large JavaScript Web apps can be hard to develop and slow to run. Google's Dart language may offer a solution to address both of those issues.

While Dart is really good in its own V8 JavaScript engine, it did not perform as well when compiled with the help of its own dart2java tool in a normal JavaScript code.

JavaScript's popularity among developers has lifted the fortunes of TypeScript, which Microsoft developed to address JavaScript's shortcomings to build complex, large-scale applications, in the latest ...

Bill Atchison, aka incrediBILL, an administrator at the WebmasterWorld forums, posted a thread at WebmasterWorld asking if some premium publishers are allowed to bypass the normal JavaScript based ...