Functional programming is sometimes defined in opposition to object-oriented programming (OOP) and procedural programming. That is misleading as these approaches are not mutually exclusive and ...

But no. Functional programming isn’t what it isn’t. Functional programmers aren’t ascetics. Haskell is not a “bondage and discipline” language. (If I’m into both, it’s just a ...

Purely functional programming is a brilliant idea with a misleading name. When people talk about “purely functional programming”, they mean Haskell or something like Haskell. But that’s not ...

Functional programming is an approach to software development in which applications are constructed by creating and composing functions to achieve a desired outcome. In the functional programming ...

Reactive programming is an approach to building software that models IO as streams of events. With reactive programming, developers can compose and work with applications in a declarative ...

If you want to know how well a technology is doing, just look at who's lining up to learn it. In the case of Reactive programming, online education trends point to a mainstreaming of the erstwhile ...

Functional programming, as the name implies, is about functions. While functions are part of just about every programming paradigm, including JavaScript, a functional programmer has unique ...

Functional programming languages will have a place in general application development when we can read their code at a glance What is functional programming? The simple answer: Everything is a ...

Functional programming has “increased our reliability in a really big way,” said Adam Ernst, ... This approach requires optimization to make the code run as quickly as possible.